Denna alarmerande rapport kommer från Gordon Duff, Veterans Today:

“Israel, given AIPAC’s “warmongering,” has been seen by many as orchestrating, not just the “civil war” in Syria, but the false-flag gas attacks as well.”

källa

• Press TV’s interview with Iran FM
• ‘Syria to be safe with Russia’s proposal’

A week ago, a US Air Force cargo plane left Charleston Air Force Base, home of Colonel Lindsey Graham, also “Senator” Lindsey Graham, one of the most powerful advocates for war against Syria (and Russia).

It landed in Tbilisi Airport, in the Republic of Georgia. There, it was loaded with what local sources indicate to be “ammunition from the Lugar Lab.”

Every aspect of this operation was observed, from South Carolina to Tbilisi.

On Monday, September 9, 2012, Richard Norland, the US Ambassador to Georgia and reputed former Moscow station chief for the CIA during the last days of the Soviet Union, visited the “Lugar” lab.

After reports on Russian television and in the Georgian press of “irregularities” including leaked emails tying the lab to chemical weapons used by Syrian rebels, Norland took a delegation of diplomats and dignitaries on a tour of the very recently “sanitized” facility.

Norland had left the embassy in Moscow and was Washington’s top “Soviet watcher” when one of the largest intelligence failures in history occurred, the August 1991 attempted coup against Gorbachev.

Our sources on this story carry US security clearances and are part of an unrelated mission in Georgia. Other sources in Georgia have been threatened, some have gone underground.

Bio-chem weapons network

The Lugar Lab, built by the United States, is a bio-chemical warfare research facility, funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. The facility, previously called the “Central Reference Laboratory,” is similar to one constructed in Kazakhstan last year.

Funding and details on both facilities “went dark” quickly as overruns and participation by clandestine agencies were quite unrelated to any “threat reduction” role.

The management of the US-funded facility was turned over to Georgia’s version of the CIA, the Foreign Intelligence Special Service, whose head, Anna Zhvania along with Richard Norland managed the “facility sanitation” tour on Monday.

Official records show Zhvania as resigning as Georgia’s intelligence chief before taking over a “research lab.” Similarly, Norland’s cover as a diplomat has saved him from the ignominy of being cited as top policy maker for, quite perhaps, the most incompetent and corrupt intelligence agency in the world.

More challenges to Kerry’s version

Reports, with limited confirmation, detail how Al Nusra/Al Qaeda forces inside Syria had kidnapped children from occupied regions to use as “victims” of a staged false-flag attack meant to bring the US into the Syrian conflict.

Children were said to have been smothered and laid out to be photographed and filmed with video cameras. The scene was said to resemble the “Crisis Actor” operations the US Department of Homeland Security has staged, simulating terror attacks for training purposes.

By coincidence, these theatrical contracting firms have been on the scene of several real disasters, the Boston Marathon bombing, the Sandy Hook shootings and most infamously, the 7/7 London bomb attacks.

If these allegations are true, particularly this being the 12th anniversary of 9/11, an event no longer questioned by any rational individual as itself being a carefully orchestrated false-flag attack, the idea of murdering children for “political expedience” is totally plausible.

Competing intelligence operations?

There is mounting evidence that Syrian rebels were responsible for the August 2013 attacks:

• · hacked emails citing US contracting firms in the planning and execution
• · investigative journalists in Georgia
• · Press TV reports from Turkey detailing WMD transit into Syria
• · Turkey’s seizure of Sarin shipments to Al Nusra
• · Statements made to FBI by Eric Haroon which led to his arrest, silence and press smears
• · the arrest of a Turkish general in Aleppo two days ago
• · videos of rebels using Sarin gas
• · videos of rebel leaders admitting to the use of chemical weapons
• · along with witness testimony and physical evidence submitted by Russia
• Iran’s warnings to the US from March, outlining Sarin smuggling into Syria

A far better case can be made to support Russia’s position than that of the Obama White House.

Lying to Congress

In testimony before the House of Representatives yesterday, General Dempsey cited US policy as supporting “moderate forces” fighting the Assad government. However, his statement was made only moments after Secretary of State Kerry had told representatives that the US planned to “degrade” the fighting ability of the Syrian army.

The “elephant in the room” is the obvious fact that jihadist forces aligned with Al Qaeda would benefit most from US military support and that these same forces are currently trying to overthrow the US-supported government in Iraq.

Odd betrayal of Israel

There is another “elephant in the room.” Russian President Vladimir Putin indicated, should the US attack Syria, that Russia would supply the most advanced air defense systems in the world, not just to Syria but Iran as well.

We have been informed that a private understanding exists between Russia and Iran that would, should Iran be forced to respond to military threats, extend a Russian air defense “umbrella” over Iran.

Though Iran has not threatened to attack Israel, as wrongly reported widely in the press, their ability to do so without fear utterly changes the balance of power in the region.

Samson option

Israel has always held the Samson option, their ability to unleash nuclear war against Iran, even against the European Union or United States, as a keystone of their defense policy.

Israel’s air defense network, known as the Iron Dome, has proven to under-perform and requires AEGIS based US naval support to be credible.

Russian air defense systems are capable of defeating any possible Israeli nuclear threat and, in the process, leave Israel open to devastating conventional attack.

Israel, given AIPAC’s “warmongering,” has been seen by many as orchestrating, not just the “civil war” in Syria, but the false-flag gas attacks as well.

Some pundits excuse Israel entirely, blaming Saudi Arabia. However, as Saudi Arabia has no operational intelligence or clandestine capabilities in Turkey, Georgia or Iraq, this hypothesis not only fails but rings of “seeded” false intelligence.

Yet, considering Israel’s precarious position, something new for the masters of “game theory warfare,” someone has come to the “great chessboard” and clearly outclassed them.

Haroon

In March of this year, US Army veteran Eric Haroon was arrested after posting videos showing him fighting inside Syria.

He has been charged with the bizarre crime of “using Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

Many see the irony of arresting Haroon for following official US policy and using weapons identical to those the US supplies.

Moreover, few doubt that US Special Forces are not operating inside Syria.

What most think they know about Haroon is a lie. He has been attacked in the press, both “left” and “right” and charged with a bizarre crime to silence his real story.

Haroon came to the FBI in February, reporting that, while working as a CIA asset, he had been deceived into supplying Al Qaeda with sophisticated weapons.

Those weapons could be used in Iraq and probably are, but could also be used in terror attacks against any US facility. They may well have included air to ground missiles capable of downing US airliners.

The FBI arrested Haroon for admitting to using an RPG in Syria, though a CIA employee, in order to be able to block any possible testimony tying the US to Al Qaeda and to forces involved in terrorism inside Iraq. This is a classic legal ploy for silencing whistle-blowers.

Haroon was led to betray his country by the CIA or US contractors operating in Hatay Province, Turkey, and by the FBI, tasked with silencing him.

Elephant in the room

If the US is arming Al Qaeda in Syria, when did that relationship begin? Was bin Laden right, when in his last proven recorded interview in 2001 he said that those responsible for the 9/11 attacks were Americans?

All subsequent bin Laden statements have been debunked by the CIA though this fact was quickly suppressed by the media.

As we now have at least 200 members of Congress who are now openly considering White House complicity in false-flag terrorism using WMD’s in Syria, why is the consideration of an identical policy in 2001 continually termed “conspiracy theory?”

Intelligence containment failure

As of today, the “war on terror” is 12 years old. No rational member of the intelligence community has failed to consider and even accept the entire debacle as a neocon-driven plot to descend the world into anarchy and push a police state agenda to enable the world’s resources to be looted.

US military might, exactly as General Smedley Butler had warned us 80 years ago, has predictably operated as “enforcers” for global organized crime.

I cannot begin to express my personal disappointment that President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry, individuals I have supported, including financially, have proven themselves either unwilling or unable to protect and defend American freedoms.

Moreover, that I am joined in my opposition to US military involvement in Syria by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, notorious cheerleaders of the New World Order, I am also both cognizant and deeply challenged by the revelation that we have yet to plumb the depths of what may well be layers of conspiracy."

 

Den numera Internt-berömda Syrian Girl ger åtta övertygande skäl, varför Rothschildmaffian vill förinta Syrien:

1. Den syriska centralbanken står inte under Rothschildkontroll, d.v.s. inte under Bank for International Settlements, BIS, i Basel, varifrån alla de odemokratiska Basel I, II och III reglerna kommer. Kolla upp hur EU implementerar dessa regler utan att även EU-kommissionen eller EU-parlamentet fick påverka beslutsfattningen i Basel. Bara det är en rättsskandal. Den syriska centralbanken är inte heller privatägd som den amerikanska, belgiska eller italienska centralbanken (där finns det delvis privatägande). Som det ser ut förser den syriska centralbanken Syrien med pengar så att staten inte behöver skuldsätta sig hos privata banker. Det första Rothschildkrafterna tvingade Libyen till efter mordet på Gaddafi var att ställa den libyska centralbanken under BIS kontroll.

2. Syrien har därför inte heller skuldsatt sig hos IMF. Det första som muslimbrodern Mursi gjorde var att skuldsätta Egypten hos IMF trots att muslimer har förbud mot räntor.

3. Syrien har bannlyst GMO mat, som direkt infördes i Irak mot befolkningens vilja, när USA fick makten där efter det olagliga kriget 2003. Monsantos diktatur i Irak krossade många bönder och vållade stort lidande.

4. Befolkningen i Syrien är medveten om konspirationen bakom the New World Order (NWO). I Sverige sover de flesta på den punkten.

5. Syrien har egen gas och kontroll över pipelines. Israel och andra Rothschildmarionetter vill konkurrera ut Ryssland med egna pipelines genom Syrien via Turkiet till Europa.

källa

6. Syrien opponerar sig mot Zionismen och apartheidstaten Israel.

7. Syrien är den sista sekulära staten i Mellanöstern. I Syrien har olika religioner kunnat leva tillsammans sedan hundratals år.

8. Syrien har en stark nationell identitet. NWO krafterna har tidigare splittrat upp mänskligheten i olika språk och "raser" och nationer för att kunna förtrycka den så hård som möjligt. Men nu, när de kosmiska konditionerna gynnar de ljusa krafterna på jorden (David Icke: truth vibrations, vilket är inget annat än förstärkt neutrino-strålning från vintergatans centrum/svarta hål) är de mörka tvungna att skapa en världsdiktatur, NWO, för att kunna behålla makten. Då står plötsligt den så mödosamt odlade nationalism i vägen och skall förstöras genom påtvingad och odemokratisk massinvandring. Syrien är även där extremt utsatt. Det finns inget inbördeskrig i Syrien utan påtvingad massinvandring av välbetalda yrkeskriminella för att förinta en av de sista bastionerna mot Rothschilddiktaturen. I den mån är Syrien friare än Sverige som får sina ledare mot NWO avsatt (Göran Persson) eller förintat (Palme) med jämna mellanrum, sist Anna Lindh för 10 år sedan. Istället pådyvlas vi mycket skadliga USA nickedockor och förrädare som Carl Bildt.

Se även: Rothschilds kontrollerar världsekonomin

Den som ännu inte har förstått att den officiella NIST förklaringen för 911 är en primitiv lögn, är antingen mind controled, journalist i gammelmedia eller ännu dummare. Den mest vedertagna tekniska förklaringen kommer från en amerikansk grupp som kallar sig Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, AE911truth, där White TV:s Henning Witte ingår i juristgruppen. De har lyckats presentera klockrena tekniska bevis att thermite användes för att förstöra World Trade Center 1 och 2, de berömda tvillingtornen i den ena ändan av axis of evil, New York. Thermite är ett slags explosivt material som blir tillräckligt hett att smälta stål mycket snabbt. Flygbränsle kommer inte upp i sådana temperaturer.

Den vettigaste förklaringen hittills varit kontrollerad rivning, controlled demolition. WTC 1+2 har rivits med hjälp av thermite och vanliga bomber, som hördes av många inom brandkåren. Filmer visar tydligt att byggnaderna kommit ner i fritt fall. Det skulle vara omöjligt om enbart en brand från flygbränslet hade orsakat kollapsen.

Den andra och mera sällsynta förklaringen kommer från en rysk atomexpert, Dimitri Khalezov, som anför tunga argument att WTC hade enbart fått bygglov om dess rivningsmöjlighet redan byggts in från början. Till detta placerades små atombomber under WTC området, som sedan användes i 911. Se om detta White TV:s inslag: Specialbyggda atombomber orsakade 911, Nuclear Demolition

Även flera månader efter 911 var bråten på ground zero brännhett. Dessutom är ground zero ett uttryck som är reserverat för ett ställe där en atombomb har exploderat. Ordbok som kom ut efter 911 har i stor skala förfalskats för att mörklägga nuclear demolition. FBI folket gick i strålskyddskläder på bråten, men de flesta andra lät de gå utan, vilket medförde att de fick svåra strålningsskador precis som efter en atombomb. Många dog.

källa

Den tredje och mest förtryckta / hemlighållna förklaringen till WTC kollapsen kommer från Dr. Judy Wood. Hon kommer med övertygande bevis att den största delen av WTC har pulveriserats med en okänd teknologi. White TV tittare vet att en sådan teknologi skulle kunna vara skalärvapen. Enligt thermit-teorin skulle det funnits kvar mycket mera rester av själva byggnaderna och thermit smälter järn, men kan inte pulverisera den. De enorma rökmoln som täckte nästan hela New York passar inte till en konventionell förklaring. Dessutom blev många bilar i närheten enbart delvis brända. Vädret spelade ett spratt denna morgon den 11 september 2001. Väder kan ändras med skalärvapen, typ HAARP.

källa

Konstigt var också att många människor fick överleva i några av de nedersta våningarna, som om skalärvapnet inte nådde till alla områden.

Men metall förblir inte glödande efter skalärvapen i flera månader. Och varför pulveriserades inte hela byggnaden?

Alla tre förklaringar presenterar delvis övertygande bevis men kan inte förklara helheten. Skulle det kunna vara så att Mossad, CIA och FBI, de verkliga gärningsmännen bakom 911, har använt sig av en trestegsraket?

1. Längst upp användes en teknologi som skulle förespegla att ett flygplan flugit in. Vi vet att vingarna aldrig skulle kunna riva öppningar i WTC väggen så som det visades sedan. Det lätta materialet i flygplansvingarna hade smulats sönder vid kontakten med ytterväggarna. Men om man använder thermite för att spränga in ett liknade mönster i väggen, då är förklaringen enklare. Den översta delen av WTC 1 tippade litet i början, vilket indikerar att den fick en annan behandling än den stora delen under. Delen längst upp, som behandlats med thermit och kontrollerad rivning, blev delvis kvar och bildade så den lilla högen med rester, rubble, som sedan skeppades i all hast till Kina, innan experter kunde titta på det.

2. Den övervägande och största delen av WTC 1+2 pulveriserades enligt Dr. Judy Wood med okänd teknologi, mest troligt skalärvapen. Genom pulveriseringen kan fritt fall också åstadkommas.

3. Fundamentet revs med hjälp av de redan från början inbyggda miniatombomberna. Därför förblev resten på marken så hett under flera månader, vållade atomstrålning och lät marken skälva ordentligt. Att så många människor fick överleva i några av de nedersta våningsplanen av WTC skulle kunna förklaras med att atomexplosionen och skalärvapnen skapade en fri zon just i gränsområdet mellan dessa två teknologier.

En sak är i alla fall klar: vi behöver en ny och opartisk utredning om 911.

 

White TV has not exactly been a friend of the American establishment, but the recent dramatic events ref. Syria sets the U.S. president in an unexpectedly positive light. Obama is a brilliant orator. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between words and deeds with him. Anyone who thinks that the U.S. president is the most powerful person in the world is caring less to read between the lines. But those who understand that all high-ranking politicians are puppets of secret and very dark background forces would do well to weigh Obama's words carefully.

In his very important speech on Aug. 31, 2013, Obama said, inter alia: ( quote from the Washington Post )

 

"Now, after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets. This would not be an open-ended intervention. We would not put boots on the ground. Instead, our action would be designed to be limited in duration and scope. "

 

Obama uses the word Should, instead of the word shall. This leaves open the possibility of not resorting to military action. He gives a recommendation as if he would not be the one making the decision, even though he is. The conclusion can only be that he either has not decided yet, or that he simply does not want to attack Syria.

 

That he would clip the wings of the attack on Syria to a very limited effort, without even sending ground troops, means for anyone with military training or empathy that he does not want to attack Syria. It is impossible to predict if a missile attack may be limited in the case of Syria. If Syria with Russias, Chinas and Irans help defend themselves, the situation easily could escalate to an intervention with open end, as in Iraq and Afghanistan or Vietnam or World War III!

 

Obama is very talented and has good military advisers, he would never recommend such a military nonsense, if he really had the intention of attacking Syria.

 

"Moreover, the Chairman has indicated to me that our capacity to execute this mission is not time-sensitive; it will ask effective tomorrow, or next week, or one month from now. And I'm prepared to give that order."

 

To suggest that the intervention against Syria is not in a hurry is a mockery of Al-Nusra, FSA and all other Al-CIAda terrorists and Israel, which is the only western country with their national security involved in the events in Syria. If you also follow the propaganda lie that the gas attacks have been launched by the Assad regime, then any delay with a blow to the Syrian regime could cost new gas victims.

 

By shrinking the campaign against Syria to a limited attack, Obama encapsulates very astute the discussion to the level of a military stupidity, which can only benefit the Assad regime and world peace.

 

Obama uses the word prepared, which also indicates that he has not decided. After that long time, and all the terrible events he should have made a decision. The most sensible conclusion is also here: Obama does not want to attack Syria, but he has to lie about this, because he has the Rothschild whip in the neck.

 

"I've long believed that our power is rooted not just in our military might, but in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. And that's why I've made ??a second decision: I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people's Representatives in Congress. "

 

Why does Obama come with this objection so late, when he is already under the gallows? Because he has always played a clever delay tactics. According to his own actions against Iran before he does not need Congressional approval to start the war. He could rely on NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) of 2012, which gives the U.S. president powers, without congressional approval to take military action against another nation.

 

Let's see how Obama has previously acted against the Rothschild Mafia . Googling Obama against Rothschild will not show many hits. " Tim Rifat's World geopolitical Analysis 28th November 2012 Netanyahu is now after Obama and his administration for having prevented an attack on Iran ob June the 18th that's why Petraus is being humiliated for being heterosexual says h Rifat ".

or: Rothschild Dynasty Slams Obama, writes the talented journalist Michael Collins Piper .

 

source

But if you google Obama against Israel, information is teeming with Jewish complaints. You must know that Israel is the worst Rothschild puppet-state. There even is a blog titled: Jews Against Obama.

 

The Telegraph has published a long list of 10 top points where Obama is accused to have insulted Israel.

 

For example Obama is smeared for having dared to resume diplomatic relations with Syria February 2010.

 

Obama must have humiliated Israel Benjamin Netanyahu by letting him wait over an hour in the White House.

 

Obama believes that Israel is the main reason for the destabilization of the Middle East.

 

And the worst sin of all: Obama compares the suffering of the Palestinian people with the Holocaust.

 

Do not forget: Obama agreed with criticism of French President Sarkozy expressed against Benjamin Netanyahu , when the microphones had been turned off.

 

Another headline in Fox News: Why Obama has abandoned Israel and Jews Should abandon Obama

 

Jerusalem Post titles in January 2013: Is Obama the most anti-Israel president in the history of the United States?

 

Obama lets anti-semitism and attacks on Israel happen , barks another publisher.

 

Obama anti Zionism is illustrated in another blog.

 

Reuters on September 2, 2013: "If President Barack Obama has disappointed Syrian rebels by deferring to Congress before bombing Damascus, he has also dismayed the United States' two main allies in the Middle East. "

 

The Swedish media scolds Obama for his critical attitude towards Israel: " "It is impossible to have a jewish democratic state and at the same time control the entire Land of Israel - Eretz Yisrae." (says Obama, White TV's note)

It was a for all Israelis immediately understandable slap against Prime Minister Netanyahu and his new government dominated by religious Orthodox politicians who want to seize all or most of the occupied West Bank, thereby achieving the goal of Jews to populate the entire biblical Eretz Yisrael . " points the Swedish Institute of International Affairs.

 

"Obama is trying to push Israel into a new Holocaust." complain of another Swedish blogger .

 

So it is obvious that Obama is trying not to dance to the Rothschilds pipe as best he can and that he focuses on the world peace most essential points. Would he respond fully to all the atrocities he was required (drones, Gitmo, etc.), he would have been torpedoed from power long ago. He seems to have saved his powder for the main points. One of these we experienced 31 August 2013.

 

Because Obama acts very hidden, the German media speculated that he was subjected to a military mutiny in the process. Against this speaks that he has not fired any high-General yet and above all, Russia announced the same day, August 31, 2013, that they no longer intend to pursue their major arms shipments to Syria , such as anti-aircraft rockets of type S-300, modernized variants of attack jets MiG-29 aircraft and the type Jakowlew Yak-130. The reasons stated Russia, Syria would not have paid these supplies to the fullest. This is of course nonsense, but a nearby explanation is that Obama and Putin have made a deal: the U.S. does not attack Syria and in return Russia stops arming Syria to the benefit of Israel.

 

Such a deal could not possibly be carried out by the U.S. military alone, it needs Obama's involvement.

 

Therefore, the theory that Obama settled down after pressure from a military coup against him is not as likely.

 

The simplest explanation is that Obama got the Nobel peace prize rightly so. Do not forget how he had been influenced as a child: Muslim!

 

Finally, the key evidence that Obama is threatened by Rothschild power: November 21, 2012 announced Obama aboard Air Force One following press release :

"The President's text below, unedited:
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
November 21, 2012

Presidential Memorandum –

National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

 

Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies

 

Subject: National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

 

This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security. These threats encompass potential espionage, violent acts against the Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems.

The Minimum Standards provide departments and agencies with the minimum elements necessary to establish effective insider threat programs. These elements include the capability to gather, integrate, and centrally analyze and respond to key threat-related information; monitor employee use of classified networks; provide the workforce with insider threat awareness training; and protect the civil liberties and privacy of all personnel.

The resulting insider threat capabilities will strengthen the protection of classified information across the executive branch and reinforce our defenses against both adversaries and insiders who misuse their access and endanger our national security.

Barack Obama –"

 

This means that Obama felt threatened to life already in November 2012.

 

According to insiders within the FBI and the U.S. military the threats come from Israel, ie Rothschild, see the interview with Tim Rifats below. This is confirmed by 9-3-13  feature in the New York Times, where AIPAC, Israels lobby in the United States, is pointed at but then censored away ...

 

A good indication that Rothschild forces are behind the threats to Barack Obama is that no medium has published this startling press release from Obama. Most of the media is controlled by the Rothschild cabal.

 

If White TV's analysis is correct Obama is in great danger, just as John F. Kennedy was, who refused to bring the U.S. into the Vietnam War. Would anything happen to Obama, Mossad is responsible, Rothschilds super criminal bloodhounds.

 

Some parts of the Swedish and American security apparatus are concerned that an attack on Obama may be performed during his stay in Sweden. Sweden is classified as high-risk country, after Mossad's involvement in the Palme murder , M/S Estonia ferryboat mass murder and the 10 year old murder of Anna Lindh, Sweden’s late secretary of state. Sweden has regrettably become Mossad-controlled.

 

Let us pray for Obama's safety! And thank him!

 

källa

Det tyska parlamentet Bundestag har ett kontrollorgan som övervakar de tyska säkerhetstjänsterna Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), Militärischer Abschirmdienst (MAD) och Verfassungsschutz. Kontrollanterna heter Das Parlamentarische Kontrollgremium (PKGr).Tidigare satt den berömde Andreas von Bülow (SPD) som ordförande i mer än 10 år, idag är det socialdemokraternas (SPD) Thomas Oppermann. Han verkar vara lika modig som Bülow, då han idag, den 3 sept 2013, underkände de bevis, som BND genom avlyssning har presenterat, för att Assad-regimen i Syrien skulle vara ansvarig för giftgasattacken den 21 aug 2013 i flera av Damaskus förorter. Hittills har inga vettiga bevis offentliggjorts av västmakterna.

BND är tyska motsvarigheten till SÄPO.

Filmsnutten från tyska Tagesschau (motsvarigheten till Rapport) är tyvärr enbart på tyska:

Se även White TV:s inslag: Varför attackerar USA inte FSA/al Nusra-terroristerna, som tidigare bevisligen använt giftgas i Syrien?;

Gasattack i Syrien naturligtvis gjort av FSA/västterrorister;